Minnesota Responsible Animal Owners Alliance / Minnesota Council of Dog Clubs
Becoming a Member
Home
Puppy Mills
What to do ?
Minnesota shelter statistics
Minnesota Legislation
National Legislation
How a Bill Becomes Law in Minnesota
News and Information
Responsibility
Tethering
Learn More
Events
Becoming a Member
Contact Us
Links
Minnesota Humane
Minnesota Humane Agent
Minnesota Animal Control

Scroll down the page

A fundamental problem underlying anti-dog legislation is that the larger audience of responsible owners and breeders who are the innocent victims become burdened with the excessive restrictions of ownership. Because of the disconnect in thinking between the legislation and its intended purpose, anti-dog proposals only serve as a catalyst that eventually polarizes the community.

The chronology surrounding this kind of legislation typically begins with an incident- -very often a bite. The process that follows identifies one or more breeds as an important threat to the community. The participants and victims include dog owners, interested citizens, the media, elected officials and the animal rights groups. One of the ingredients used to promote this kind of legislation is the use of undefined labels which effectively stigmatize or characterize the owners and the breed(s) in a negative way. Undefined labels such as “puppy mill”, “dangerous dogs”, “vicious dogs”, and “dogs out of control” are used to promote the need for severe legal action. Throughout the process no one questions the use of the undefined labels, perhaps because they are aimed at a lesser species that cannot speak for themselves. Others believe the answer may lie in our lack of understanding how the media, elected officials and the animal rights groups see the problem, and how they are drawn to use and apply undefined labels to achieve their goals. A useful way to review this phenomenon is to notice what factors are needed to produce the incendiary reaction that gives credence to anti-dog legislation

........Unfortunately, in most communities, dog owners do not become involved until they are faced with the consequences of the legislation. This means that others drive the agenda that affects their pets. Historically, the response to dog problems has been to fight each proposal one by one, city by city. This approach no longer ........

**********A new strategy with a more penetrating and focused effort is needed.one that embraces coalitions of informed citizens whose purpose is to guide and steer the course of legislation and the political future of officials who are bent on eliminating dogs from their community.Dr. CarmenBattaglia *********We invite you to join us...we need your expertise, enthusiasim, experience and commitment...Please help US be part of the SOLUTION...............

Contact Us

to contact us click here

MRAOA is a Minnesota non profit organization

                                                   Be a responsible animal owner!